« Guily Pleasures? | Main | Travel Photography »

November 21, 2005

Nos. 4 and 5

Okay, okay, okay. No one found it funny that my Top 5 Guilty Pleasures in my last post only had 3 entries. By popular demand, here are numbers 4 and 5

Dave's Top 5 TV/Movie Guilty Pleasures (Nos. 4 and 5)

  1. Chick Flicks - Yeah, I'm hugely guilty on this one. I'm a total sucker for a good chick flick. A group of us from Grace Street went out just this past weekend to see the new Pride and Prejudice. And I have to admit, it was one of the best movies I've seen in quite a while. The cinematography was inspired, and made me decide that if I do indeed go to art school, it will be for cinematography and not photography. And if it's possible to be in love with a fictional character, I'm madly smitten with Keira Knightly's Elizabeth Bennet. So in conclusion, yeah, I'm a sucker for a chick flick. I proudly own Anne of Green Gables, the A&E Pride and Prejudice, and Joe Versus the Volcano is an all-time favorite.

  2. Bad movies in fun theaters - I once saw Mission Impossible II at the Mann's Chinese theater in Los Angeles. The movie was awful. Downright embarrasing, really. But it was opening night, and the 3000+ seating was full. In the really cheesey parts, people were yelling at the screen and laughing at poor attempts at drama. It was beautiful. Just goes to show that even the worst of movies can be fun.

Okay, now that really does conclude my Top 5. Any questions?

Entry posted by byscuits on November 21, 2005 10:45 AM

Comments

Ahh..chick flick, one of the many categories we invented so we don't have to be ashamed for loving crappy art, like "stupid but funny", "dumb action", and "frank getty." I don't like pushing all romantic movies into the category "chick flick," I think there's two categories, romantic comedies/dramas (of which there are far too few these days), and chick-splotation (of which most are called chick flicks). The chick-splotation has the basic components: a train-wreck of a woman with no discernable traits (see julia roberts) or sometimes overly dripping with cutesy-ness (meg ryan), and a charming and thoughtful (but dumb) himbo (see dopey brown haired white guy from any movie) with some kind of cutesy job (nursery school teacher, furniture builder, poet, anything helpful in building a house), they have some meeting of cutesy dialouge, fall in love, some contrived problem comes along, and the guy does some dramatic guesture to win her back. These aren't romantic comedies, these aren't two members of the opposite sex having a battle of wits and calling it a draw in the end, they are made exclusively for women, playing up their self-doubts and fears, reassuring them that love will find them, someday, in a sweeping gesture. And they're as creative and good as say, Doom, or Cinderella II: No, you're not stupid for marrying him Cinderella, you're just a big romantic and sometimes you let the romantic impulses get the better of your judgement.

Comment posted by Tandy Computers at November 21, 2005 12:54 PM

Well, I guess under those definitions, only the Joe Versus the Volcano is really a "ckick flick", and hey, I first saw that one when I was like 12 on HBO. It just sort of stuck.

As far as romantic dramas go, I really do think Pride and Prejudice (both of them) and Anne of Green Gables are excellent films. Anne's character has such depth, but of course a good deal of that's probably due to there being 8 hours of film.

Dude, we just need to write a real romantic comedy. Somehow riduculing people who go with their romantic impulses that contradict their better judgement. People like me.

Comment posted by drgandy [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 21, 2005 01:20 PM

How can you talk about bad movies in good theater atmospheres w/o claiming fame for your "The Mummy" outing?

Comment posted by ryan at November 21, 2005 01:47 PM

I dunno dave, love isn't supposed to make sense, you're supposed to feeeeel it. Sometimes you'll like someone for no good reason, you just do. If there is no logical reason for love, then it must be right. Save the self-justification for later "they just don't know what he/she's really like, and he/she can change over time, right?"

But yes, I'd love to have some kind of Machiavellian opus: he's friends with her so that she befrinds this guy so she wants to date him, so that the other girl will want to date him. Oh yes, we don't mature out of our middle school selfs, we just find better vocabulary and philosophy to justify it.

Much ado about nothing is really good, too.

Comment posted by Tandy Computers at November 21, 2005 01:51 PM

Tandy:
Ahh, yes. We've mentioned two great movies where the lead female character is very witty - Pride and Prejudice and Much Ado about Nothing.

As of late, I've been lamenting to anyone who'll listen about the lack of witty lead female characters in movies as of late. Except, perhaps, those movies based on older works. Such as the two mentioned above.

Ryan:
I really don't remember The Mummy story you're speaking of. I do however, remember disliking The Mummy the first time I saw it. Much like your Mummy.

Comment posted by drgandy [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 21, 2005 02:00 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?